It’s been illuminating to read the stream of complaints concerning inadequacies of the Cycle Partnership Boards. Firstly, because no residents’ association was present; subsequently, when no less than four residents’ associations were present, the complaint became the absence of one specific business grouping. Other complaints have been that motorist and bus-user specific groups were not represented. Even a ‘stitch-up’ was claimed. Of what, given that the task is helping to inform the development of options and ultimately a plan for full public consultation, is not obvious.

But why stop there: what of national retailers, well represented on the relevant high streets, health professionals, air quality experts, road engineering companies, and on and on; indeed, why not “me” or “mine”, which seems to be the real cry. A line has to be drawn on attendance numbers, as well as accepting that the prospect of these tens of millions of pounds from the Conservative mayor is absolutely based on encouraging active travel, not blocking it.

The alternative would be a full public vote – although that happened in May 2014 when the high profile anti-Cycle Enfield investment candidates polled only a few per cent. Acknowledging the people’s voice? It would appear only when it speaks your personal desires.

K Brown

Old Park Road, Palmers Green